[QUOTE="Ocko]
And for questioning the coaching? At the moment we are joint top - therefore he is doing his job. When we arent in the mix then question it. But if we are at the top, playing decent hockey, then what could we possibly criticize? Electro has said coaching is the issue; but what part is? Specifically what has he been doing wrong? It's a broad sweeping statement with little substance.
In my opinion previous teams under Lord had more potential than the end results would suggest. My opinion, I'm not going to argue the point.
The home game in front of the owners, was that a game bigger than say the challenge cup or play off finals. Was that and previous home losses down to the stress of playing at home, I certainly hope not, we have chosen profession players, who have faced stress in their careers. So in my opinion l concluded that is not a factor, of course l can be wrong, if l am, then that is a fault of who picked the players, l feel that is leading towards the coach. I concluded the loss, was not normal for a team of the quality we have, so, as in any organisation that manages staff and suffers a shift in performance and expectation, you look within, it's usual to find the weakest member. In my opinion Lord is that person, again l could be completely incorrect. I'm analysing based on watching the team and its performance, nothing more, l feel l need to point that out. I'd like to write that l get some members opinions of the club, but l don't.
As for what Lord can do to improve, I've no idea, I've no idea of many roles people within my organisation do, that's why there there. That does not mean l cannot identify there performance. I would also not place anybody within a role and expect them to perform beyond their capabilities, experience.
Don't get too high with the highs and too low with the lows, yes l agree, l would also add "leave the emotions at the venue".
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
So you don't mind the current situation and you like the uncertainty? But you don't think we will win anything? So you're not a fan of the Devils then? I've yet to meet a fan of any team in any sport who doesn't want to win something.
Also, if you don't know a person's role within your organisation how can you then possibly assess their performance? You're going on what others' assessment is of that person which means reliance on their performance in their role assessing the other person?
I really do find it difficult trying to make sense of much of what you say. I'm sure it isn't your intention to confuse me and I'm sorry for that but when I read your posts having hopefully navigated through your grammar I see opposite arguments most of the time in the same post.
I think you believe having Lord as coach is fine even though he's not up to the role because you don't particularly care if we don't win anything.
Is that correct?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk