The mind does boggle when you think a team in London has proved to be unsustainable to date but if there isn’t a suitable venue then it just shows that even London, one of the most recognised metropolitans in the world, will struggle.
The Docks Arena was difficult to attract travelling fans from across the city and beyond and during the very expensive Superleague era. Lee Valley was too small to sustain a relatively cheaper Elite League team. You need something in between. Is Wembley that though? I’m not sure. I think it’s too big for this current level if hockey. It would ultimately come down to how much the Wembley Arena would charge for rent. I’m guessing it wouldn’t be cheap.
There is an argument that if one city could host higher than league average crowds then it’s London. It will have a huge expat community from Canada, Scandinavia and Eastern Europe and the shear population to generate interest. However, there would have to be a huge marketing push and a sustained one at that. Like most of the UK, London in particular is football dominated but that in itself can work in our favour – something new.
The benefits of a London team to the sport in the UK are potentially hugely rewarding. You can therefore see why there is a continued desire to have a team there. We can also then again boast the fact that we have every capital city playing in the same league, something that us surprisingly unique.
Is Wembley the right venue and is the timing right for the fragile league, especially with the newly established conference system as the report alludes to? These are the determining questions that need to be strongly considered. If they do go ahead, there will be huge pressure to get it right this time. Failure 3 times in as many decades could see the end of any London team playing at the highest level for a very long time.