Why haven't the Devils contested any disciplinary decisions ?

B

Budgie

Member
#1
Thread starter #1
As it says, ban on Conboy for face wash that was dreamed eye gouging, multiple hits on Ben Davies off Play and now Myers 3 match ban for a fair and soft check to the body, that even the Blaze commentators couldn't understand.

We seemed to have just rolled over and let the league walk all over us :cry:
 
O

Ocko

Well-Known Member
#2
#2
Re: Why hasn't the Devils contested any disciplinary decisio

I have no doubt the Conboy ban wasn't appealed just to get rid of him. Nickerson got his reduced for a worse offence so it is likely we would have had some success.

Looking for a crap excuse and shifting the blame bare all the hallmarks of our MD, GM, DofH or whatever the bald fool calls himself.
 
Sheincar

Sheincar

Well-Known Member
#3
#3
Re: Why hasn't the Devils contested any disciplinary decisio

Because you have to pay to appeal & you lose your money if you lose appeal?
 
O

Ocko

Well-Known Member
#8
#8
Re: Why hasn't the Devils contested any disciplinary decisio

chillee said:
voth26 said:
What the hell does that comment mean?????
Click to expand...
He may not get a contract at any club.
Click to expand...
That is one of the most ridiculous comments I've seen on this forum. Whether you like his style of play or not Myers would be a very in demand Brit in this league and a GB international. Most Panthers fans would rip your arm off to get him back. IMO there are only a handful of other Brits in the league who are on an equal or better level than Matt. To say he might not get an Elite League contract is crazy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top